วันอาทิตย์ที่ 3 กุมภาพันธ์ พ.ศ. 2556

Seagram Building: Mies Van der Rohe vs. Ornament and Crime

To begin with, Mies Van de Rohe has said this famous motto – “Less is more”.  It became the symbolic motto of Modernist Architecture. It is remarkably unornamented, practical, and functional.


Seagram Building is a steel structure, glass and concrete edifice with non-structural I-beams wrapped around it vertically. There are a few ‘betrayal’ mistakes of an ideal modernistic principle that Mies had made in this building:









 1.   Decoration in steel I-beams: Decoration = Ornament = Crime!

According to Loos’s “Ornament and Crime”, this is obviously count as a crime because it just stick there covering up the concrete columns that hid the spectacle structure (for a modernist…). The steel I-beams do not perform a functional matter. Instead it is an exaggerated portion of the hidden beams. Doubling the amount of steel beams are not exactly what “Less is more” is about. That would end up a great amount of money needed, and source too. Loos would drop his jaw over how modernist cost less in this case (the Seagram building were the world most expensive skyscraper at that time). These I-beams are just a new form of ornament for modernism style, which may look very non-bourgeois, very plain. In the other hand, Mies needed to respect Bauhaus principle of disclosure of structural basis. This expression of structure is quite important in Bauhaus style.







2.   Brass-colored glass walls:  Despite the Bauhaus style, the brass-colored glass walls were a representative symbol of a distiller company; whiskey-like color. As one of the importances of Bauhaus style is honest material, which artificial color and paint are not very appreciative, these glass walls absolutely failed this principle.


Mies could not restrain his design within the Bauhaus and modernist theory. There could have been factors that cannot make this building meeting the requirement of being truly modernistic constructed. Factors like regulation over fireproof material covering the structure could cause him to these mistakes. Anyhow, he had made a remarkable building that still has it timeless beauty in it. 


Korapin A.
      























ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น